No. 23-244

Lawyers for Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2023-09-14
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights conflicts-of-interest due-process free-speech judicial-admission local-rules nonuniform-standards professional-speech standing third-circuit writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference: 2023-11-03
Question Presented (from Petition)

Has the Petitioner established good cause for this Court to issue a writ of certiorari before judgment because the nonuniform local rules directly contradict this Court's holdings in Siegel v. Fitzgerald, and Students For Fair Admission v. Harvard, and NIFLA v. Becerra, when the record shows the Third Circuit is beset with extraordinary conflicts of interest and has wholly refused to consider Petitioner's claims?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Has the Petitioner established good cause for this Court to issue a writ of certiorari before judgment because the nonuniform local rules directly contradict this Court's holdings in Siegel v. Fitzgerald, Students For Fair Admission v. Harvard, and NIFLA v. Becerra, when the record shows the Third Circuit is beset with extraordinary conflicts of interest and has wholly refused to consider Petitioner's claims?

Docket Entries

2023-11-06
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2023.
2023-10-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due October 16, 2023)

Attorneys

Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission
Joseph Robert Giannini — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent