No. 23-242
Jonathan M. Martinez v. United States
Tags: 6th-amendment constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process jury-trial jury-unanimity military-conviction military-justice sixth-amendment unanimous-verdict uniform-code-military-justice
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether military convictions for serious offenses must be unanimous.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether military convictions for serious offenses must be unanimous
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-09
Reply of petitioners Jonathan M. Martinez, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2023-12-27
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-11-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 27, 2023.
2023-11-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 6, 2023 to December 27, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-11-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 6, 2023.
2023-10-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 6, 2023 to December 6, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-10-05
Response Requested. (Due November 6, 2023)
2023-10-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/27/2023.
2023-09-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 16, 2023)
Attorneys
Jonathan M. Martinez, et al.
Stephen I. Vladeck — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent