1. Whether words printed on clothing are pure speech, and thus presumptively entitled to First Amendment protection—as the Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Circuits have held—or whether they are protected only if they convey a "particularized message," as the Eighth Circuit below, and the Sixth and Seventh Circuits, have held.

2. Whether, in light of important new historical evidence, this Court should reconsider the doctrine of qualified immunity.

3. Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that a First Amendment right to unobtrusively observe and record police performing their duties in public is not clearly established.

whether-words-on-clothing-are-protected-speech