No. 23-213

Brian O'Grady v. United States, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-09-07
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: circuit-court-conflict circuit-split discretionary-function-exception federal-tort-claims-act government-liability negligence subject-matter-jurisdiction wildland-fire wildland-fire-response
Latest Conference: 2023-11-03
Question Presented (from Petition)

In Rayonier, infra, this c ourt held that the Federal tort c laims Act (F tcA) "makes the u nited States liable ( with certain exceptions which are not relevant here ) for the negligence of its employees" in responding to wildland fire, ruling that none of the FTCA statutory exceptions apply in this context. ( emphasis added). Yet, four subsequent c ircuit c ourts of Appeals have all held that the F tcA "discretionary function exception" bars liability for negligent wildland fire response, contrary to Rayonier . Given the conflict, is the United States liable for the negligence of its wildland fire managers?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the United States liable for the negligence of its wildland fire managers?

Docket Entries

2023-11-06
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/3/2023.
2023-10-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 10, 2023)

Attorneys

Brian O'Grady
Quentin M. RhoadesRhoades & Erickson PLLC, Petitioner
Schurg, Michelle, et al.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent