No. 23-2
Gerald Spruell v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-review conspiracy criminal-procedure drug-conspiracy drug-quantities evidence evidence-sufficiency jury-verdict mandatory-minimum sentencing sentencing-guidelines
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding
there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's
verdict and drug quantities attributed to the conspiracy
charge.
2. Whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding
that the district court's erroneous mandatory minimum
and Guidelines application was harmless.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's verdict and drug quantities attributed to the conspiracy charge
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-06-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 31, 2023)
Attorneys
Gerald Spruell
Jeremy Brian Gordon — Law Office of Jeremy Gordon, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent