No. 23-195
Aaron Hashim, et al. v. Malia M. Cohen, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as State Controller of California, et al.
Relisted (2)
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment california constitutional-law due-process notice-requirement property-rights takings takings-clause unclaimed-property
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess Takings FifthAmendment
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity DueProcess Takings FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Controller's actions under color of
the California Unclaimed Property Law, Cal. Civ.
Proc. Code §§ 1300, et seq. ("CUPL"), violate the Due
Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
because they deprive owners of their property without
affording constitutionally adequate notice.
2. Whether the Controller's actions under color of
the California UPL violate the Takings Clause of the
Fifth Amendment because they take private property
without just compensation.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Controller's actions under color of the California Unclaimed Property Law violate the Due Process Clause and Takings Clause
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-30
Rescheduled.
2023-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-09-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 1, 2023.
2023-09-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 2, 2023 to November 1, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-08-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 2, 2023)
Attorneys
Aaron Hashim, et al.
Laurence Henry Tribe — Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP, Petitioner
Malia Cohen, individually and in her official capacity as State Controller of the State of California, et al.
Joshua Patashnik — California Department of Justice, Respondent