No. 23-193
Richard Rynn v. First Transit, Inc., et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: abuse-of-process civil-rights constitutional-rights court-proceedings dismissal due-process employment-retaliation freedom-of-speech judicial-recusal retaliation
Latest Conference:
2023-10-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Should assigned District court judge John Tuchi recuse himself from personal involvement and conflict of interest of subject matter in dispute?
2. During course of employment is employer responsible for directing its employees to retaliate, abuse of court proceedings, without disclosure of false accusations, in violation of constitutional rights, due process, and freedom of speech?
3. Can countersuit be dismissed while subject matter of fraud, due process violations remain in dispute?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should assigned District court judge recuse himself due to conflict of interest?
Docket Entries
2023-10-16
Petition DENIED.
2023-09-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/13/2023.
2023-09-08
Waiver of right of respondent First Transit, Inc. to respond filed.
2023-07-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 29, 2023)
2023-05-17
Application (22A1001) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until July 22, 2023.
2023-05-10
Application (22A1001) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 23, 2023 to July 22, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
First Transit, Inc.
Kimberly M. Shappley — Littler Mesndelson, P.C., Respondent
Richard Rynn
Richard Rynn — Petitioner