(1) Whether a jail intake officer with no responsibility
for classification or cell assignments nevertheless
had a clearly established constitutional duty to
inform others that a compliant inmate had been
arrested for an allegedly racially motivated
assault so that inmate's housing assignment could
be determined by a separate department.

(2) Assuming this constitutional duty was clearly
established, whether the Eleventh Circuit's
direction to racially segregate is procedurally
defective because it did not provide procedural
guideposts.

Whether a jail intake officer had a clearly-established constitutional duty to inform others about an inmate's alleged racial animus in underlying charges