1. Is due process of law guaranteed by the 5th
and 14th Amendments to the Constitution of the
United States violated by the Board's refusal to hear
petitioner's administrative appeal pursuant to
Worker's Compensation Law Section 23 owing to an
omission from an information block 3/64th of an inch
high, so small the brain cannot process it when an
alternate source of the same information is listed?

2. Does burdening the right to counsel in civil
cases guaranteed by the 5th and 14th Amendments
to the United States Constitution to the point that
the Board can refuse to entertain a less than
perfectly filled out Application for Board Review
(form RB 89) notwithstanding lack of prejudice to
opposing parties?

3. Is equal protection of the law guaranteed by
the 14th Amendment by burdening the exercise of
the right to counsel with a requirement that
Application for Board Review (RB 89) be completed
perfectly?

Is due process of law violated by refusal to hear administrative appeal due to omission in information block?