No. 23-1342
David W. Foley, Jr., et ux. v. Orange County, Florida, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: 14th-amendment administrative-injunction constitutional-provision due-process federal-courts fourteenth-amendment judicial-determination state-courts state-law
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Securities
DueProcess FifthAmendment Securities
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments require federal and state courts to answer the question of state law that the claimant alleges is dispositive of their claim.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments require federal and state courts to answer the question of state law that the claimant alleges is dispositive of their claim
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-23
Supplemental brief of petitioners David W. Foley, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2024-08-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent Orange County, Florida to respond filed.
2024-06-28
Waiver of right of respondents Tim Boldig, Mitch Gordon, Tara Gould, Carol Hossfield, Rocco Relvini, Phil Smith to respond filed.
2024-06-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 26, 2024)
2024-05-08
Application (23A992) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until June 20, 2024.
2024-04-28
Application (23A992) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 21, 2024 to July 20, 2024, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
David W. Foley, et al.
David W. Foley Jr. — Petitioner
Orange County, Florida
Lee Bernbaum — Orange County Attorney's Office, Respondent
Tim Boldig, Mitch Gordon, Tara Gould, Carol Hossfield, Rocco Relvini, Phil Smith
Jessica Christy Conner — Dean, Ringers, Morgan & Lawton, P.A., Respondent