No. 23-1263
Ibrahim Donmez v. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, et al.
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure complaint-screening dismissal due-process in-forma-pauperis judicial-procedure screening standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Does the language of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(b)(ii) allow screening or dismissal of non-frivolous non-prisoner complaints before service of process and defendants' answer?
2) Did the District Court incorrectly construe petitioner's amended complaint as a motion to reopen a case or start a new case?
3) Did the District Court and the Court of Appeals repeatedly subject petitioner to intrinsic fraud, extrinsic fraud, judicial usurpation of power and deprivation of due process?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(b)(ii) allow screening or dismissal of non-frivolous non-prisoner complaints before service of process and defendants' answer?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-07-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-05-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 3, 2024)
Attorneys
Ibrahim Donmez
Ibrahim Donmez — Petitioner