1. Have the Marshal service requirements of 9 U.S.C. § 9 on an application to confirm an arbitration award on a nonresident foreign adverse party been implicitly repealed?

2. If the answer to Question Presented No. 1 is no, does 9 U.S.C. § 9 provide a viable method of service on a nonresident foreign adverse party outside of the U.S.?

3. If the answer to Question Presented No. 2 is no, is the appropriate fallback provision for service of an application to confirm an arbitration award on a nonresident foreign adverse party outside of the U.S., F.R.C.P. Rule 4 as followed in the Second Circuit, or F.R.C.P. Rule 5 (b) as followed in the Ninth Circuit?

Have the Marshal service requirements of 9 U.S.C. § 9 on an application to confirm an arbitration award on a nonresident foreign adverse party been implicitly repealed?