No. 23-1242
Taurean Jerome Weber v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: digital-property digital-trespass exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment good-faith-exception government-intrusion search terms-of-service trespass warrantless-search
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Did the Court of Appeals err when it determined Instagram's boilerplate Terms of Service delineated Petitioner's Fourth Amendment rights and held no search occurred?
2. Does the Fourth Amendment forbid warrantless government trespass on an individual's digital property under the rationale of United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400, 406 (2012)?
3. Did the Ninth Circuit err when it alternatively held that the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule saved suppression?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Court of Appeals err when it determined Instagram's boilerplate Terms of Service delineated Petitioner's Fourth Amendment rights and held no search occurred?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-10
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-05-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 24, 2024)
Attorneys
Taurean Jerome Weber
Peter Francis Lacny — Datsopoulos, MacDonald & Lind, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent