Two questions are presented:

1. Whether the recipients of a cease-and-desist letter—which falsely accuses them of defamation, threatens imminent litigation, demands retractions, requires they preserve texts and emails, and insists they respond, and which is copied to a national newspaper as well as to the recipients—have an injury-in-fact for purposes of Article III standing.

2. Whether the petitioners' equal protection rights under the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause requires the Tenth Circuit to publish its opinion on injury-in-fact as binding precedent for all circuit litigants, not just the petitioners.

Whether recipients of a cease-and-desist letter have Article III standing