No. 23-1217
Chestek PLLC v. Kathi Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office
Amici (5)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-law agency-rulemaking federal-circuit notice-and-comment patent-office patent-trademark-office rulemaking statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration SocialSecurity Securities Immigration Trademark Patent Copyright Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration SocialSecurity Securities Immigration Trademark Patent Copyright Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the PTO is exempt from notice-and-comment requirements when exercising its rulemaking power under 35 U.S.C. § 2(b)(2).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the PTO is exempt from notice-and-comment requirements when exercising its rulemaking power under 35 U.S.C. § 2(b)(2)
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-29
Reply of Chestek PLLC submitted.
2024-08-29
Reply of petitioner Chestek PLLC filed. (Distributed)
2024-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-14
Brief of respondent Kathi Vidal in opposition filed.
2024-08-14
Brief of respondent Kathi Vidal, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office in opposition filed.
2024-06-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 14, 2024.
2024-06-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 15, 2024 to August 14, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-06-14
Brief amicus curiae of The Bar of Association for the District of Columbia filed.
2024-06-14
Brief amici curiae of Cato Institute and Ethics and Public Policy Center filed.
2024-06-14
Brief amicus curiae of IEEE-USA filed.
2024-06-13
Brief amicus curiae of New Civil Liberties Alliance filed.
2024-06-13
Brief amici curiae of International Game Developers Association and CodeMiko Project, LLC filed.
2024-05-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 15, 2024.
2024-05-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 14, 2024 to July 15, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-05-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 14, 2024)
Attorneys
Cato Institute and Ethics and Public Policy Center
Thomas Arthur Berry — Cato Institute, Amicus
Chestek PLLC
Andrew Michael Grossman — Baker & Hostetler LLP, Petitioner
IEEE-USA
International Game Developers Association and CodeMiko Project, LLC
Brandon James Huffman — Odin Law and Media, Amicus
Kathi Vidal
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent
New Civil Liberties Alliance
Gregory Dolin — New Civil Liberties Alliance, Amicus
The Bar of Association for the District of Columbia