No. 23-1212

In Re Justin Mahwikizi

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-05-13
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: arbitration-exemption ending-forced-arbitration-of-sexual-assault-and-se equal-protection equal-protection-clause federal-arbitration-act judicial-review section-1 section-3
Key Terms:
Arbitration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act should be used to shield the Federal Arbitration Act's Section 1 exemption claim denials from judicial review, and whether this action premises the constitutional violation of the Equal Protection Clause, which prevents the differential governmental treatment of those attempting to exercise their right for judicial review when all claims are supposedly subject to arbitration.

Whether section 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act renders the whole Statute unconstitutional for violating litigants' equal protection under the Law rights by prohibiting interlocutory appeals following a Section 1 exemption claim denial.

Whether the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (EFASASHA) implicitly renders Congressional intent to promote arbitration moot, and renders the Federal Arbitration Act's constitutionality unfruitful.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether section 3 of the Federal Arbitration Act should be used to shield the Federal Arbitration Act's Section 1 exemption claim denials from judicial review, and whether this action premises the constitutional violation of the Equal Protection Clause

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-05-22
Waiver of right of respondents Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC to respond filed.
2024-05-09

Attorneys

Justin Mahwikizi
Justin Mahwikizi — Petitioner
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Andrew M. SpurchiseLittler Mendelson P.C., Respondent