Petitioner presents the following questions to this Court and asserts all below should be answered in the affirmative:

1. Whether the Court below misconstrues Petitioner's principal cause of action?

2. Whether this Rule 60(d)(3) motion raises preserved federal claims of first instance?

3. Whether District Court has jurisdiction over Petitioner's constitutional challenges to state action?

4. Whether judicial notice must be granted, for the Court's requirement to hear Petitioner's claims?

5. Whether Petitioner is prejudiced, by the refusal to review his motion for narrowly tailored expedited discovery of the fraudulently concealed facts?

6. Whether Petitioner's prima facie evidence has established an obligatory rebuttable presumption?

7. Whether the unconstitutional Order is facially void and should be immediately quashed by default?

Whether the Court below misconstrues Petitioner's principal cause of action?