No. 23-1203
Terpsehore Maras v. Mayfield City School District Board of Education, et al.
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process federal-jurisdiction minors mootness mootness-doctrine parental-rights pro-se-representation pro-se-rights statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1654, do minors have pro se rights that can be asserted by their parents on their behalf based on a parent's fundamental right to control their child's legal claims?
2. Does the mootness doctrine bar adjudication of a claim brought by a parent when the claim of her minor daughter in the same action terminates by virtue of mootness?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
pro-se-rights,parental-rights,minors,mootness,civil-rights,due-process
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-06-20
Reply of Terpsehore Maras submitted.
2024-06-20
Reply of petitioner Terpsehore Maras filed.(July 2, 2024) (Distributed)
2024-06-20
Reply of petitioner Terpsehore Maras filed. (July 2, 2024) (Distributed)
2024-06-10
Brief of respondents Mayfield City School District Board of Education, et al. in opposition filed.
2024-05-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 10, 2024)
Attorneys
Mayfield City School District Board of Education, Its Superintendent Dr. Michael J. Barnes, and Its Members Ron Fornaro, Sue Grozek, Al Hess, George Hughes, and Jimmy Teresi
Thomas L. Feher — Thompson Hine LLP, Respondent
Terpsehore Maras