No. 23-1181
Amici (1)
Tags: autopsy-report confrontation-clause criminal-investigation criminal-procedure evidence hearsay-evidence medical-examiner medical-examiner-testimony sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Does the admission of an autopsy report and testimony from a doctor who neither participated in the autopsy nor prepared the report violate the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the admission of an autopsy report and testimony from a doctor who neither participated in the autopsy nor prepared the report violate the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation-Clause?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-24
Reply of petitioner Gail M. Ritchey filed. (Distributed)
2024-06-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-05-30
Brief amicus curiae of Office of the Ohio Public Defender filed.
2024-05-29
Brief of respondent Ohio in opposition filed.
2024-04-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 31, 2024)
2024-02-28
Application (23A794) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until April 27, 2024.
2024-02-16
Application (23A794) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 27, 2024 to April 27, 2024, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Gail M. Ritchey
Steven Larry Bradley — Marein and Bradley, Petitioner
Office of the Ohio Public Defender
State of Ohio
Nicholas Andrew Burling — Geauga County Prosecutor's Office, Respondent