No. 23-1169

Michael H. Ponder v. Hans-Peter Wild

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-04-30
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: appellate-review circuit-precedent contract-law contract-specificity legal-interpretation oral-agreement precedent sixth-circuit specificity standard-of-review
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether this Court should grant certiorari review where the Sixth Circuit departed from established precedent regarding the required specificity of terms in an oral agreement.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether this Court should grant certiorari review where the Sixth Circuit departed from established precedent regarding the required specificity of terms in an oral agreement

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-05-24
Brief of respondent Hans-Peter Wild in opposition filed.
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word CountMain DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count
2024-04-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 30, 2024)
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of ServicePetitionAppendixCertificate of Word Count

Attorneys

Hans-Peter Wild
Aaron R Maurice — Maurice Wood, Respondent
Michael H. Ponder
Margo L. Grubbs — Grubbs Law Firm, PLLC, Petitioner