No. 23-1161
Children’s Health Defense, et al. v. Food and Drug Administration, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: agency-action article-iii case-or-controversy constitutional-standing injury-in-fact resource-diversion standing vaccine-safety
Latest Conference:
2024-06-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a Constitutionally cognizable case or controversy exists under Article III when agency action causes substantial resource diversion of an organization and exposes children they represent to an unvetted and unsafe "vaccine", in light of this Court's conflicting injury-in-fact standards set forth in United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures, 412 U.S. 669 (1973) and TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 495 U.S. 413 (2021)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a Constitutionally cognizable case or controversy exists under Article III
Docket Entries
2024-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
2024-05-28
Waiver of right of respondent FDA, et al. to respond filed.
2024-04-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 28, 2024)
Attorneys
Children’s Health Defense, et al.
Robert Edward Barnes — Barnes law, Petitioner
FDA, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent