No. 23-1154
Kurtis M. Bailey, et al. v. Worthington Cylinder Corporation, et al.
Tags: appeal case-redress civil-procedure civil-rights counsel-disqualification disqualification-of-counsel due-process justice-stevens legal-modification standing supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
ERISA DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri Jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2024-06-20
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should Richardson-Merrell, Inc. v. Koller, 472 U.S. 424, be modified so that the disqualification of counsel does not result in a catastrophic violation of due process that is not capable of redress, as was foreseen by Justice Stevens in his dissent, and as was demonstrated in this case?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should Richardson-Merrell,-Inc.-v.-Koller-be-modified
Docket Entries
2024-06-24
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2024-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
2024-04-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 23, 2024)
Attorneys
Kurtis M. Bailey, et al.
Daniel Jason Russo — Maas & Russo LLP, Petitioner