No. 23-1145
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: case-or-controversy criminal-conviction deportation deportation-consequences federal-jurisdiction habeas immigration-consequences ineffective-assistance post-conviction-relief sixth-amendment standing strickland-standard
Latest Conference:
2024-05-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the real threat of deportation as a result of a federal criminal conviction establishes standing and a real case in controversy for federal courts to retain jurisdiction of a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the real threat of deportation as a result of a federal criminal conviction establishes standing and a real case in controversy for federal courts to retain jurisdiction of a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255?
Docket Entries
2024-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2024.
2024-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2024-04-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 22, 2024)
Attorneys
Ojin Kim
Theodore Mark Cooperstein — Theodore Cooperstein PLLC, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent