This is a petition for "Writ of Certiorari " author ized by 28 U.S.C. §165 1(a) because this Court has ju risdiction over several issues that were determined adversely by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which jeopardized the poorly funded individual inventors, lacking legal intelligence, "exclu sive rights to their inventions " granted under 35 U.S.C. §271 and guaranteed by the U.S. Congress under Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution.

The questions presented are:

1. Whether the Court erred in denying proper compensation, including "Cease and Desist order ", re quested by the patentee.

2. Whether the Court erred when it granted a "non-infringement " judgment under "Doctrine of equivalent " by relying on non-infringing elements while neglecting the undisputable intrinsic evidences of infringing elements.

3. Whether the Court erred when it punished non-related third party, such as Mudguard Tech. LLC, because of a public notice published by a patent owner to protect his rights required under 35 U.S. Code §287.

4. Whether the Court erred when it wrongly pe nalized Mudguard Tech. LLC instead of penalizing Fleet for the "Tortious Interference with Business Re lations (Michigan Law) " knowing that Great Dane Trailers was Mudguard 's customer when Fleet inter fered with Mudguard business relationship.

Therefore, the Court needs to settle these issues to protect the rights of poorly funded small inventors in the USA.

Whether the Court erred in denying proper compensation, including 'Cease and Desist order', requested by the patentee