No. 23-1124
Judson Hawkins, et al. v. Ohio Department of Natural Resources
Response Waived
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment administrative-agency constitutional-interpretation due-process procedural-rights property-rights substantive-rights
Latest Conference:
2024-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
(1) Does the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantee a substantive right to prevail against the state when supported by the facts?
(2) Does the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution permit a state administrative agency to interpret statutes and administrative rules in such a manner that deny an individual a procedural right to prevail at trial and upon appeal?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantee a substantive right to prevail against the state when supported by the facts?
Docket Entries
2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-18
Waiver of right of respondent Ohio Department of Natural Resources to respond filed.
2024-04-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 17, 2024)
Attorneys
Judson Hawkins, et al.
Judson J. Hawkins — Judson J. Hawkins, Petitioner
Ohio Department of Natural Resources
Michael Jason Hendershot — Ohio Attorney General's Office, Respondent