Given the historical foundations of the writ of habeas corpus, did the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces err by dismissing, for lack of jurisdiction, the petitioner's case, without considering that the essence of habeas corpus jurisdiction should be predicated on the authority to review and potentially overturn the decision to detain, rather than merely on jurisdiction over the individual detained?

Did the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces err in dismissing the petitioner's habeas corpus case for lack of jurisdiction?