No. 23-1101
Jacob N. Ferguson v. Robbin M. Owen
Response Waived
Tags: alternative-means d.c.-circuit free-exercise government-permit religious-exercise religious-freedom-restoration-act religious-question-of-law seat-of-government substantial-burden
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity FirstAmendment Securities Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity FirstAmendment Securities Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether religious exercise must be required, central, or important to a system of religious belief.
2. Whether the availability of alternative means counsels against finding a substantial burden.
3. Whether the substantial burden test is a religious or secular question of law.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether religious exercise must be required, central, or important to a system of religious belief
Docket Entries
2024-07-22
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-06-27
DISTRIBUTED.
2024-06-07
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-11
Waiver of right of respondent Owen, Robbin M. to respond filed.
2024-04-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 10, 2024)
Attorneys
Jacob N. Ferguson
Jacob N. Ferguson — Petitioner
Owen, Robbin M.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent