No. 23-1100

Albert Jones v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2024-04-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 5th-amendment civil-rights criminal-procedure defendant-rights doyle-v-ohio due-process miranda-warning post-miranda right-to-silence selective-invocation
Latest Conference: 2024-05-09
Question Presented (from Petition)

Do the protections of Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 (1976)—which prohibit a prosecutor on commenting on a defendant's post-Miranda warning invocation of silence—apply when a defendant selectively invokes his right to remain silent as to certain topics, but freely answers questions on other topics?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Do the protections of Doyle v. Ohio apply when a defendant selectively invokes his right to remain silent?

Docket Entries

2024-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2024.
2024-04-10
Waiver of right of respondent State of California to respond filed.
2024-03-12

Attorneys

Albert Jones
Hanni M. FakhouryMoeel Lah Fakhoury LLP, Petitioner
State of California
David M. BaskindCalifornia Department of Justice, Respondent