No. 23-1091
Call-A-Head Portable Toilets, Inc., et al. v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law administrative-proceeding confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process evidence sixth-amendment witness-testimony
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-05-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
Do the accused in State administrative proceedings have a Sixth Amendment right to confront and cross-examine witnesses whose written testimony serves as evidence against the accused?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Do the accused in State administrative proceedings have a Sixth Amendment right to confront and cross-examine witnesses whose written testimony serves as evidence against the accused?
Docket Entries
2024-05-28
Petition DENIED.
2024-05-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2024.
2024-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent NY State Dept. of Envtl. Conserv, et al. to respond filed.
2024-04-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 8, 2024)
2024-02-06
Application (23A717) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until April 4, 2024.
2024-01-31
Application (23A717) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 19, 2024 to April 4, 2024, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Call-A-Head Portable Toilets, Inc., et al.
Austin Reis Graff — The Scher Law Firm, LLP, Petitioner
NY State Dept. of Envtl. Conserv, et al.
Barbara Dale Underwood — Solicitor General, Respondent