1. Whether any federal law or the U.S. Constitu
tion authorize any federal judge to penalize or punish
any person because such person stated in written fed
eral court filings that one or more federal judges know
ingly violated rights and freedoms expressly secured to
persons by the U.S. Constitution and federal laws or
that such judge(s) committed federal offenses {e.g., in
18 U.S.C. 241, 242, 371, 1001, 1341, 1343, 1349, 1512
or 1519).

2. When an attorney challenges reciprocal dis
barment, whether federal law or the U.S. Constitution
authorize any federal court (including the U.S. Su
preme Court) to disbar an attorney (i.e., deprive the at
torney of his liberty and property, e.g., license to
practice his profession in such court) for purported
misconduct without such federal court, itself, expressly
identifying the particular standard(s) of conduct such
court concluded were relevant, identifying the attorney
conduct that purportedly violated any such standard,
identifying the facts material to proving how any such
attorney conduct violated any such standard, and iden
tifying the evidence that was admissible and admitted
to prove all material facts.

3. When an attorney challenges reciprocal dis
barment and requests a hearing, whether federal law
governing federal courts or the U.S. Constitution au
thorize any federal court (including the U.S. Supreme
Court) to disbar such attorney before affording such at
torney advance notice of the standards such court (at
least initially) concluded were violated and the conduct
that such court (at least initially) concluded violated
any such standard and a hearing, in compliance with
the Federal Rules of Evidence, regarding any issue
identified (in federal law, our Constitution or U.S. Su
preme Court precedent) as relevant.

Whether federal law or the U.S. Constitution authorize federal judges to penalize persons for stating federal judges violated rights