1. In a vote-dilution challenge to at-large elections imposed by state law, does Section 2 also require a plaintiff to propose a remedy that does not alter the State's chosen electoral model?

2. Are a State's asserted policy interests for its choice of at-large elections entitled to insurmountable weight under Section 2?

Whether Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires a plaintiff challenging at-large elections to propose a remedy that does not alter the State's chosen electoral model