Whether evidence of a defense attorney's impairment due to substance abuse discovered after the first petition for post-conviction relief was decided is precluded as a successive notice of post-conviction relief as an ineffective assistance of counsel argument under the Sixth Amendment or constitutes newly discovered evidence and is a violation of a defendant's right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment.

Whether evidence of a defense attorney's impairment due to substance abuse discovered after the first petition for post-conviction relief was decided is precluded as a successive notice of post-conviction relief as an ineffective assistance of counsel argument under the Sixth Amendment or constitutes newly discovered evidence and is a violation of a defendant's right to counsel under the Sixth Amendment