No. 23-1040
Scott Smith v. Entrepreneur Media, Inc.
Tags: appeal civil-procedure federal-statute judgment-renewal motion-to-dismiss ninth-circuit renewal-of-judgment state-law
Latest Conference:
2024-05-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit err in granting Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Appeal by failing to consider Petitioner's arguments that the district court erred by applying federal statute instead of State of California substantive law for vacating a renewal of judgment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit err in granting Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Appeal by failing to consider Petitioner's arguments that the district court erred by applying federal statute instead of State of California substantive law for vacating a renewal of judgment?
Docket Entries
2024-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2024-03-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 19, 2024)
2024-01-16
Application (23A650) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 18, 2024.
2024-01-08
Application (23A650) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 18, 2024 to March 18, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Scott Smith
Scott Smith — Petitioner