No. 23-1028
Shannon Poe v. Idaho Conservation League
Amici (2)Relisted (2)
Tags: addition-of-pollutant chevron-deference clean-water-act discharge-of-pollutant navigable-waters ninth-circuit-ruling pollutant-discharge statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2024-07-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether there is a "discharge of a pollutant" under the Clean Water Act when material already within a regulated waterbody is merely moved or resuspended within that waterbody?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether there is a 'discharge of a pollutant' under the Clean Water Act when material already within a regulated waterbody is merely moved or resuspended within that waterbody?
Docket Entries
2024-07-02
Petition DENIED.
2024-06-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 7/1/2024.
2024-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
2024-05-31
Reply of petitioner Shannon Poe filed.
2024-05-20
Brief of respondent Idaho Conservation League in opposition filed.
2024-04-18
Brief amici curiae of West Virginia, et al. filed.
2024-04-18
Brief amicus curiae of Center for Constitutional Responsibility filed.
2024-04-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 20, 2024.
2024-04-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 18, 2024 to May 20, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-03-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 18, 2024)
Attorneys
Center for Constitutional Responsibility
Steven Paul Lehotsky — Lehotsky Keller Cohn LLP, Amicus
Idaho Conservation League
Kirti Datla — Earthjustice, Respondent
Laurence J. Lucas — Advocates for the West, Respondent
Shannon Poe
Frank Dawson Garrison IV — Pacific Legal Foundation, Petitioner
West Virginia and 20 Other States