No. 23-1008
Gwyneth K. Murray-Nolan v. Scott Rubin, et al.
Tags: appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-law context due-process expressive-conduct first-amendment free-speech judicial-precedent legal-interpretation standing
Latest Conference:
2024-05-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether conduct must convey a particularized
message to be protected as expressive under the First
Amendment.
2. Whether the full context of conduct must be
considered to determine its expressive nature.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether conduct must convey a particularized message to be protected as expressive under the First Amendment
Docket Entries
2024-05-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2024.
2024-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 15, 2024)
Attorneys
Gwyneth K. Murray-Nolan
Christopher E. Mills — Spero Law LLC, Petitioner