No. 22-999
Janice C. Amara, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Cigna Corporation, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: 28-usc-1291 appellate-review case-by-case-balancing circuit-split final-judgment interlocutory-orders merger-rules post-judgment-proceedings postjudgment-proceedings pragmatic-finality
Key Terms:
ERISA Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
ERISA Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-05-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
May litigants wait until the end of postjudgment proceedings to appeal, with the scope of appeal including all related postjudgment decisions, or is the right to appeal postjudgment orders subject to case-by-case balancing?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May litigants wait until the end of postjudgment proceedings to appeal, with the scope of appeal including all related postjudgment decisions, or is the right to appeal postjudgment orders subject to case-by-case balancing?
Docket Entries
2023-05-15
Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2023-04-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-20
Waiver of right of respondents Cigna Corporation, et al. to respond filed.
2023-04-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 15, 2023)
Attorneys
Cigna Corporation, et al.
Michael Edward Kenneally Jr. — Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Respondent
Janice C. Amara, et al.
Christopher J. Wright — HWG LLP, Petitioner