No. 22-993
Amici (2)
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process factual-innocence federal-courts federal-procedure habeas-corpus innocence judicial-review
Latest Conference:
2023-05-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER, GIVEN THE CHAOS IN THE
LOWER COURTS ON THE EXISTENCE OR
SCOPE OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT NOT TO BE IMPRISONED
WHEN FACTUALLY INNOCENT, AND THE
CLEAR INTENT OF THE FRAMERS WITH
RESPECT TO THIS POINT, THIS COURT
SHOULD DEFINE THE RIGHT?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the federal constitutional right not to be imprisoned when factually innocent exists and should be defined by the Court
Docket Entries
2023-05-15
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-05
Brief amici curiae of Cross Party Members of Both Houses of the United Kingdom Parliament filed. (Distributed)
2023-05-02
Brief amici curiae of Professors Daniel Brudney, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2023-04-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-10
Petition for writ of habeas corpus filed.
Attorneys
Cross Party Members of Both Houses of the United Kingdom Parliament
Michael Patrick Yingling — Reed Smith LLP, Amicus
DANIEL BRUDNEY
Frank Panopoulos — Amicus
Krishna Maharaj
Eric Leslie Lewis — Lewis Baach Kaufmann Middlemiss PLLC, Petitioner