Whether the California Court of Appeal erred in holding that the California doctrine of "equitable tolling" applied so as to toll the one-year statute of limitations under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(d) in derogation of this Court's express holding and rationale as articulated in Rotkiske v. Klemm, 589 U.S. ___, 140 S.Ct. 355, 205 L.Ed.2d 291 (2019).

Whether the California Court of Appeal erred in holding that the California doctrine of 'equitable tolling' applied so as to toll the one-year statute of limitations under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(d) in derogation of this Court's express holding and rationale as articulated in Rotkiske v. Klemm, 589 US. __, 140 S.Ct. 355, 205 L.Ed.2d 291 (2019)