1. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred, in conflict
with decisions of other circuits, in holding that for
purposes of applying the categorical approach the
Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering (VICAR)
statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1959, is divisible into an
indefinite number of distinct crimes based not on the
structure of the statute but on how the government
satisfied VICAR's unlawfulness element.

2. Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in holding
that "extreme recklessness" crimes necessarily
involve a use of force against the person or property
of another.

Whether the Fourth Circuit erred in holding that the Violent Crimes in Aid of Racketeering (VICAR) statute is divisible