Martine Bernard v. Christopher Hodyl
1. Whether statutory psychotherapist patient privilege and the right to liberty or autonomy provided in the due process clause of the United States Constitution bar a state court from forcing Petitioner to either use court-appointed "treating family therapist, file her therapy treatment summary and subpoena said therapist to be examined by the court, or face $100.00 per day in monetary sanctions?
2. Whether the right to procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution bar a state court from issuing monetary sanctions against a party for not contacting a "court-appointed" treating family therapist, without the court first providing notice, a hearing, or having a motion and affidavit from the opposing party?
Whether statutory psychotherapist-patient privilege and due-process bar state court from forcing petitioner to use court-appointed therapist or face sanctions