No. 22-920
ViSalus, Inc. v. Lori Wakefield, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Response Waived
Tags: article-iii article-iii-standing civil-rights class-action concrete-injury due-process marketing-communications standing statutory-damages tcpa-violation telephone-consumer-protection-act
Latest Conference:
2023-04-14
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, in light of TransUnion , receipt of a phone call after opting in to receive marketing communications is a "concrete injury in fact" sufficient to confer Article III standing for purposes of a TCPA action.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether receipt of a phone call after opting in to receive marketing communications is a 'concrete injury in fact' sufficient to confer Article III standing for purposes of a TCPA action
Docket Entries
2023-04-17
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2023.
2023-03-22
Waiver of right of respondent Lori Wakefield to respond filed.
2023-03-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 20, 2023)
2023-01-10
Application (22A610) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 19, 2023.
2023-01-05
Application (22A610) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 18, 2023 to March 19, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Lori Wakefield
John Aaron Lawson — Edelson PC, Respondent
ViSalus, Inc.
Lisa Marie Burnett — Sacro and Walker LLP, Petitioner