No. 22-882
Merrilee Stewart v. RRL Holding Company of Ohio, LLC, et al.
Tags: case-stay civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment government-petition judicial-procedure legal-redress petition-government redress-grievances standing
Key Terms:
Arbitration FirstAmendment DueProcess
Arbitration FirstAmendment DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-05-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
When an officer of the court, indefinity stays a case of significance, for example from 2015 to 2023 (8 years), is this an unconstitutional gag on the claims and defenses of the Petitioner and contrary to the Constitutional right (in the First Amendment) to "petition the government for the redress of grievances"?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Unconstitutional gag on claims and defenses
Docket Entries
2023-07-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED.
2023-06-09
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-05-15
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-01-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 14, 2023)
Attorneys
Merrilee Stewart
Merrilee Stewart — Petitioner