Daniel L. Pohle v. Michael Pence, et al.
1. Whether the President of the United States is bound by the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution to seek injunction against a Governor of a state who provides a venue for an International Corporation to litigate a sales contract dispute against a United States Corporation in violation of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. (CISG)
2. Whether the knowing and willful non-compliance with a ratified United States Treaty by a President of the United States and other persons represents a Criminal Conspiracy against the United States of America under 18 -U.S. Code -371 or Treason under 18 -U.S. Code 2381.
3. Whether the knowing and willful non-compliance with a ratified United States Treaty by a President of the United States and other persons resulting in the blocking of Otter Creek Trading Co Inc and Daniel L. Pohle 's Constitutional Right to Due Process in a court with proper jurisdiction represents a Criminal Conspiracy to Violate the Constitutional Rights of another person under 18 U. S. Code 241.
4. Whether the Rooker -Feldman Doctrine can be constitutional if it has been used as a tool of fraud by the United States Department of Justice and the State of Indiana to moot the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) signed by the United States of America and ninety-four other nations.
Whether the President is bound by the Supremacy Clause to seek injunction against a state governor violating the CISG