No. 22-866
John Franklin Bell, Jr. v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Tags: thus requiring a COA and plenary consideration by certificate-of-appealability dna-evidence due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prejudice standard-of-review trial-counsel
Latest Conference:
2023-05-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
Are petitioner's due process and ineffective assistance of counsel claims debatable among reasonable jurists, thus requiring a COA and plenary consideration by a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are petitioner's due process and ineffective assistance of counsel claims debatable among reasonable jurists, thus requiring a COA and plenary consideration by a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals?
Docket Entries
2023-05-15
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-03-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 12, 2023)
Attorneys
John Franklin Bell
Randolph L. Schaffer Jr. — The Schaffer Lawfirm, Petitioner