No. 22-858
John W. Fink v. Jonathan L. Bishop, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: bias civil-procedure civil-rights due-process impartiality judicial-bias plenary-hearing rule-12(b)(6) rule-60(d) standing third-circuit
Latest Conference:
2023-05-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Third Circuit judges repeatedly fail to impartially decide my underlying appeal case, as well as other previous appeal cases of mine?
Did the Third Circuit fail to conduct a true plenary hearing, especially since they did not address any of the 50+ judiciary violations which had deprived me of due process and which the Respondents had not disproved with specificity?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Third Circuit judges repeatedly fail to impartially decide my underlying appeal case, as well as other previous appeal cases of mine?
Docket Entries
2023-05-15
Petition DENIED.
2023-04-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-03-23
Waiver of right of respondents Flaster Greenberg, P.C. and J. Philip Kirchner to respond filed.
2023-03-16
Waiver of right of respondents Suez WTS USA, Inc. (now known as Veolia WTS USA Inc.) and Steven W. Davis to respond filed.
2023-02-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 10, 2023)
Attorneys
Flaster Greenberg, P.C. and J. Philip Kirchner
Daniel A. Malet — McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, Respondent
John W. Fink
John W. Fink — Petitioner
Suez WTS USA, Inc. (now known as Veolia WTS USA Inc.) and Steven W. Davis
Thomas James Donlon — Robinson & Cole, LLP, Respondent