What is the government's interpretation of an order against all contact and communication and presence?

If the Court agrees that the power of the people's government does not extend to stop all contact and communication, has the defendant challenged the order properly?

Under what circumstances must a State recognize withdrawal of a plea?

Is it not perfectly beneficial to the victim of a crime to profit from the court's powers of persuasion that the accused — not, is irretrievably and hopelessly reprehensible, but rather that he — is accused of a crime?

Will the Court prioritize the peace of any over the peace of the State?

Who is the victim, when statute penalizes breaking a protection order, if not the reputation of the Court?

Will the Court recognize that the underlying protection order was not issued in accordance with statute?

What is the government's interpretation of an order against all contact and communication and presence?