Are Judges Liable for Equity, Prospective and/or Legal relief when they
Usurped, Lacked, or Lost their Jurisdiction, Discretion or Violated Common, Case
or Statute, Law Mandates/Ministerial Acts or have acted as Trespassers in the
law or who fail to comply with said Mandates,U.S. v Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649,
654, 1898 and Bogan v Scott'Karris, 523 U.S. 44, 51-52, 1888 and/or deny a
Plaintiff of his 1st, 4th' 5th, 6th' 8th, 9th and 14th Amendment Rights to the Common
Law and are they liable for Intentional Violations of Rights, and would Federal
Judges be civilly liable for violating this mandate or is the injured only entitled to
have their decisions, opinions and orders declared void and unenforceable?

Does 42 U.S.C. §1983 remove Absolute Immunity when the injured party
does not have declaratory relief available in the State and given the Legislature
abrogated absolute immunity for Judges under such a position and requires the
Judge prove he has absolute immunity by proving the Plaintiff has declaratory
relief in the State?

Does an accused deal with Judges in their official capacity when they have
pre-conceived fictitious and bogus charges when said Judges were being actively
sued by the accused and with the aid of all Police officers, 4 other trial Judges and
5 Appellate Court Judges to Rail Road the accused by this vast conspiracy to retal
-iate against him or vent their spleens against the accused and have turned a
criminal trial into a Kangaroo Court Proceeding? Would said officials be immune
under these circumstances? A144, Statement 66, Pierson v Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 562
, 567-568, Ft. Nt. D 19675 Blackstone 's Commentaries, Book 1, Chapter 9, Page
342.

Judges Liability for Equity, Prospective and/or Legal Relief