Did the 11th U.S. Court Of Appeals err when the 3 Judge Panel & 12 Judge En Banc Panel Per Curiam issued the 11-2-21 Opinion Affirming the Bankruptcy Pro Tunc Technique after the Willful Violation of 5-14-15, that Court 2-24-20 Archdiocese V. Acevedo, Et al. in direct conflict with the Supreme?

Does not the lack of enforcement of this Case lead to total disrespect for Acevedo, making it moot with a ripple effect for U.S. Supreme Court Justices diminishment of past, current, future Opinions/authority over all the Lower Tribunals & Judges below; encourage, (not discourage) future abuse of process, affecting entity(ies) & person(s) now certain to experience continued Willful Violations, weakening 11 U.S.C. § 362 Automatic Stay & 362(k)(1); leading to billions, trillions of $ of confiscations, foreclosures?

Did the 11th US Court of Appeals err in affirming the Bankruptcy Court's use of an arbitrary Nunc Pro Tunc technique after a willful violation of the automatic stay?