No. 22-801
Ameen Salaam v. Illinois, ex. rel. Kimberly Foxx
Response Waived
Tags: civil-forfeiture civil-judicial-forfeiture due-process in-rem-jurisdiction judicial-procedure notice notice-requirement passage-of-time void-judgment
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. When a court has in rem jurisdiction can it enter a final judgment without the notice required by the due process clause.
2. Whether a judgment that is void because the notice necessitated by the due process clause was not provided can become unassailable by the passage of time.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court can enter a final judgment without the notice required by the due process clause
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-24
Waiver of right of respondent The People of the State of Illinois Ex Rel. Kimberly Foxx to respond filed.
2023-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 27, 2023)
2022-12-21
Application (22A559) granted by Justice Barrett extending the time to file until February 23, 2023.
2022-12-07
Application (22A559) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 25, 2022 to February 23, 2023, submitted to Justice Barrett.
Attorneys
Ameen Salaam
Steven Allen Greenberg — Greenberg Trial Lawyers, Petitioner
The People of the State of Illinois Ex Rel. Kimberly Foxx