No. 22-797
Marquay Quamaine Sheppard v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: appeal circuit-court-precedent criminal-appeal criminal-procedure district-court due-process fourth-circuit precedent sentencing supreme-court supreme-court-decisions
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-03-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Fourth Circuit err by dismissing the Petitioner's appeal and affirming the 188 month sentence imposed by the trial court, inasmuch as this decision was inconsistent with the circuit court's own precedent and inconsistent with the decisions of the United States Supreme Court.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Fourth Circuit err by dismissing the Petitioner's appeal and affirming the 188 month sentence imposed by the trial court, inasmuch as this decision was inconsistent with the circuit court's own precedent and inconsistent with the decisions of the United States Supreme Court
Docket Entries
2023-03-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-03-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
2023-02-24
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-02-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 24, 2023)
Attorneys
Marquay Quamaine Sheppard
Joseph Lester Ledford — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent